Peter's legal issue stemming from copying another realtor's ad is an example of which type of claim?

The situation described involving Peter copying another realtor's ad relates directly to the concept of Advertising Injury. Advertising Injury claims typically encompass a variety of offenses connected to the promotion of goods or services, including the unauthorized use of another party's advertising. In this case, Peter's action of copying an advertisement falls under this category, as it directly impacts the original advertiser's ability to market their brand effectively and could mislead consumers.

This type of claim highlights the importance of intellectual property rights in advertising and underscores how businesses must respect and protect the creative content of others. An Advertising Injury could lead to legal repercussions for Peter, as it can result in damages to the original advertiser's reputation and business.

In contrast, the other listed options pertain to different legal contexts: Wrongful Entry involves unauthorized access to someone's property, Libel and Slander refer specifically to defamation through written or spoken false statements, and Malicious Prosecution involves a legal claim stemming from wrongful initiation of criminal or civil proceedings. Each of these claims is distinct and does not fit the scenario involving Peter's copying of an advertisement, making Advertising Injury the appropriate classification for this legal issue.