What type of fraud has Emma committed when she claims her art prints are originals?

Emma's action of claiming her art prints are originals, when they are not, is a clear example of soft fraud. Soft fraud involves deception that is not necessarily criminal but is intended to mislead or gain an unfair advantage. In this case, Emma is misrepresenting the nature of the products she is selling, aiming to deceive potential buyers into believing they are purchasing original artwork, which typically commands a higher price.

Soft fraud can often involve exaggeration or misrepresentation rather than outright falsehoods. While it may not involve blatant criminal intent, it still constitutes unethical behavior. This subtlety distinguishes it from hard fraud, which typically involves more severe and intentional acts aimed at defrauding another party.

The other options do not fit this scenario. Tortfeasor refers to a person who commits a tort, which is a wrongful act leading to civil legal liability, but is not specific to fraud. Concealment involves the hiding of information that should be disclosed, while soft fraud relates to making false claims or representations. Hard fraud is a more serious, intentional act of deceiving someone for financial gain, which does not necessarily apply to Emma's situation.